🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.